有難題,好苦惱...
同事問我有冇興趣同cx一起進行portage的data analysis工作.
難在是project我一直冇跟開,同cx真是不知該怎合作.(仲有一班同cx一樣都係auntie級的老師:()
二是手上的工作已有做不完的感覺,有套adhd的課程只是開了個頭,但是進展就大墮後v.v
三是一直不認同同事的做法,明明是一套authentic ax的工具,要搞到好似standardised ax tool咁,跟本就係有違套工具的原意. 此外, 3-5歲的special kids, 在一個standardise testing environment做出來的評估,佢'唔識'做隨時係因為佢唔liky個assessor而唔係佢真係唔識.
四,最難處:同事一直都話有專業人士同佢地講assessment唔可以同education掛鈎! 而我地ex好強調 兩者的聯繫,點傾落去呢?
快快救我呀!比d智慧我啦....
記下生活瑣事,說說好壞心情,希望有人共鳴.
4 則留言:
Agree! I'm really in doubt of the reliability of the early childhood ax results... I'm recently surprised to find that an A girl who used to be labelled as MGID at pre-primary ax is now average at P3!!!
Yet, I think it's a very meaningful mission to develop an ax for intervention (not diagnostic). After all, much has to be done when sth is to be called standardized...
classmate k
我覺得如果唔係迫你去的話...真係要諗清楚喎!
正：真係一個學習良機！
反：有無必要迫得自己咁緊，同埋同一班理念相反的人合作，真係幾吃力。
講真都几想推,因為當中可能牽及我唔多曉的stat process.一是it could be unethical as i'm not competent in that; 二是好驚會take up too much of my time so everything else will screw up :(
但karen and alice 我認同當中的價值和學習...點呢...
Yes! we shouldn't take up too much at this beginning stage. Don't burn yourself out so soon la. and...stat ma...unless u wanna do the PhD or develop in research or reli interested la...
張貼留言